Filed: Feb. 22, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2333 _ Kimberly A. Eiting, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court for * the Eastern District of Missouri Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 15, 1999 Filed: February 22, 2000 _ Before BEAM, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and KYLE, District Judge.1 PER CURIAM. Kimberly A. Eiting appeals the district court’s grant of summar
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2333 _ Kimberly A. Eiting, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court for * the Eastern District of Missouri Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 15, 1999 Filed: February 22, 2000 _ Before BEAM, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and KYLE, District Judge.1 PER CURIAM. Kimberly A. Eiting appeals the district court’s grant of summary..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-2333 ___________ Kimberly A. Eiting, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court for * the Eastern District of Missouri Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: December 15, 1999 Filed: February 22, 2000 ___________ Before BEAM, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and KYLE, District Judge.1 PER CURIAM. Kimberly A. Eiting appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment 1 The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Eiting disability insurance benefits. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an extended opinion would serve no useful purpose in this fact- intensive case. We find that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the decision of the Commissioner that Eiting is not disabled for social security purposes. We thus affirm the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
