Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Estate of Givens v. Southwestern Bell, 99-1020 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 99-1020 Visitors: 28
Filed: Feb. 11, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1020 _ Estate of Sylvester Givens, by James * Givens and Shirley Givens, Personal * Representatives, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Forrest City, Arkansas; K. L. Wynne, * Dispatcher; * * Defendants, * * Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; * * Defendant-Appellee, * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Joe Goff, Chief of Police, Forrest City * District of Arkansas. Police Department, * * [UNPUBLISHED] D
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-1020 ___________ Estate of Sylvester Givens, by James * Givens and Shirley Givens, Personal * Representatives, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Forrest City, Arkansas; K. L. Wynne, * Dispatcher; * * Defendants, * * Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; * * Defendant-Appellee, * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Joe Goff, Chief of Police, Forrest City * District of Arkansas. Police Department, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant. * __________ No. 99-1022 __________ Estate of Sylvester Givens, by James * Givens and Shirley Givens, Personal * Representatives, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * v. * * Forrest City, Arkansas; K. L. Wynne, * Dispatcher; * * Defendants, * * Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; * * Defendant-Appellant, * * Joe Goff, Chief of Police, Forrest City * Police Department, * * Defendant. * ___________ Submitted: February 7, 2000 Filed: February 11, 2000 ___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Sylvester Givens's estate appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in favor of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWB) on the estate's negligence claim after it failed to respond to SWB's request for an admission that Givens's estate did not have any facts to support its negligence claim. After reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude summary judgment was proper. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a) and (b) (matter requested is deemed admitted unless party -2- answers, and any matter admitted is "conclusively established" unless party files motion to withdraw or amend admission); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) (summary judgment is properly granted if the admissions on file show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also dismiss SWB's cross-appeal as moot. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -3-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer