Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. J G Serrano-Sanchez, 00-1629 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 00-1629 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 20, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1629NE United States of-Arnerica, * * Appellee, * 3|: v. * * On Appeal 'om the United Jose Guadalupe Serrano-Sanchez, * States District Court also known as Carlos Alvarez, also * for the District-of known as Pedro Guerro, also known * Nebraska. as Antonio Villaescusa—Ibarra, also * known as Arturo Orosco, also known * [To Be Published] as Jose Sorrano Sanchez, also known * as Carlos Savala Alvarez, also known * as Jose Guadalupe Sanch
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1629NE United States of-Arnerica, * * Appellee, * 3|: v. * * On Appeal fi'om the United Jose Guadalupe Serrano-Sanchez, * States District Court also known as Carlos Alvarez, also * for the District-of known as Pedro Guerro, also known * Nebraska. as Antonio Villaescusa—Ibarra, also * known as Arturo Orosco, also known * [To Be Published] as Jose Sorrano Sanchez, also known * as Carlos Savala Alvarez, also known * as Jose Guadalupe Sanchez, * * Appellant. * Submitted: March 10, 2000 Filed: ‘ March 20, 2000 Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Appellant is hereby granted leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to appoint counsel to represent him. The procedure in which a district court certifies that an appeal is not taken in good faith, and denies leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, should be limited to civil cases. In direct criminal appeals, district courts should process a notice of appeal in the ordinary fashion. If counsel believes that the appeal is fiivolous, the Amiga-Pensgm procedure should be followed.‘ The Court of Appeals will then determine the course of the appeal. - A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. lAnders v. California, 386 US. 738 (1967); Penson v. Ohio, 488 US. 75 (1988) -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer