Romanus Ngene-Igwe v. Peg Anderson, 99-2478 (2000)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 99-2478
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 25, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2478 _ Romanus Ngene-Igwe, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Peg Anderson; Charles Duchen; John M. * Appeal from the United States Greig; Percy G. Harris; John McDonald; * District Court for the Southern June Murphy; James R. Tyler; Jacklyn * District of Iowa. Van Ekeren; Bass Van Gilst, * individually and in their capacities as a * [UNPUBLISHED] regent of the State Universities of Iowa; * John P. Mattilla; Barry L. Falk; Harold * Crawford;
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2478 _ Romanus Ngene-Igwe, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Peg Anderson; Charles Duchen; John M. * Appeal from the United States Greig; Percy G. Harris; John McDonald; * District Court for the Southern June Murphy; James R. Tyler; Jacklyn * District of Iowa. Van Ekeren; Bass Van Gilst, * individually and in their capacities as a * [UNPUBLISHED] regent of the State Universities of Iowa; * John P. Mattilla; Barry L. Falk; Harold * Crawford; H..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-2478 ___________ Romanus Ngene-Igwe, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Peg Anderson; Charles Duchen; John M. * Appeal from the United States Greig; Percy G. Harris; John McDonald; * District Court for the Southern June Murphy; James R. Tyler; Jacklyn * District of Iowa. Van Ekeren; Bass Van Gilst, * individually and in their capacities as a * [UNPUBLISHED] regent of the State Universities of Iowa; * John P. Mattilla; Barry L. Falk; Harold * Crawford; Harvey E. Lapan; Dennis R. * Starleaf; Daniel J. Zaffarano, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: April 19, 2000 Filed: April 25, 2000 ___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Romanus Ngene-Igwe appeals the district court's denial of Ngene-Igwe's motion to reopen his lawsuit several years after the court dismissed it for failure to prosecute. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
Source: CourtListener
