Filed: May 18, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-4275 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of South Dakota. * Ken Youngman, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 11, 2000 Filed: May 18, 2000 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and HENDREN,* District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Ken Youngman appeals his convictions for assault resulting in serious bodily injury and assault with a dangerous
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-4275 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of South Dakota. * Ken Youngman, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 11, 2000 Filed: May 18, 2000 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and HENDREN,* District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Ken Youngman appeals his convictions for assault resulting in serious bodily injury and assault with a dangerous w..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-4275 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of South Dakota. * Ken Youngman, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: May 11, 2000 Filed: May 18, 2000 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and HENDREN,* District Judge. ___________ PER CURIAM. Ken Youngman appeals his convictions for assault resulting in serious bodily injury and assault with a dangerous weapon. Youngman raises several contentions related to the admissibility of certain evidence offered by the government and to the denial of his motion for a mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct. Because Youngman's appeal involves the straightforward application of settled principles of law, * The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, sitting by designation. we conclude that a discussion of the issues by the panel will serve no useful purpose. We have carefully considered Youngman's arguments and find them to be without merit. We thus affirm Youngman's convictions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
