Jack Stinnett v. A. Marlo Miller, 5819_1 (1958)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Number: 5819_1
Visitors: 34
Filed: Jul. 09, 1958
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 259 F.2d 272 Jack STINNETT v. A. Marlo MILLER. No. 5819. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. July 9, 1958. Cooney & Morgan, Farmington, N.M., for appellant. Hannett, Hannett & Cornish, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee. Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges. 1 PER DURIAM. 2 Reversed as to costs without written opinion.
259 F.2d 272
Jack STINNETT
v.
A. Marlo MILLER.
No. 5819.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
July 9, 1958.
Cooney & Morgan, Farmington, N.M., for appellant.
Hannett, Hannett & Cornish, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee.
Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.
2
Reversed as to costs without written opinion.
Source: CourtListener
