Filed: Jul. 20, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2963 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Ralph Thompson, also known as * Travell L. Glover, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Fabias L. Shipman, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 9, 2000 Filed: July 20, 2000 _ Before McMILLIAN, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Ralph Thompson pleaded g
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2963 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Ralph Thompson, also known as * Travell L. Glover, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Fabias L. Shipman, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 9, 2000 Filed: July 20, 2000 _ Before McMILLIAN, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Ralph Thompson pleaded gu..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2963
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Ralph Thompson, also known as *
Travell L. Glover, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED]
Fabias L. Shipman, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: June 9, 2000
Filed: July 20, 2000
___________
Before McMILLIAN, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Ralph Thompson pleaded guilty to
possessing with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. ยง 841(a)(1).
Following imposition of sentence, appointed counsel moved to withdraw and filed a
brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Upon review of the record and
the parties& briefs, we agree with the government that the district court&s failure at the
change-of-plea hearing to advise Thompson of the correct statutory mandatory
minimum sentence for his offense, and of the applicability and effect of the period of
supervised release he faced, was harmless error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1), (h);
United States v. Prado,
204 F.3d 843, 846 (8th Cir. 2000); United States v. McCarthy,
97 F.3d 1562, 1575 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied,
519 U.S. 1130, and
520 U.S. 1133
(1997); United States v. Osment,
13 F.3d 1240, 1242-43 (8th Cir. 1994).
Having reviewed the record, we conclude that no other non-frivolous issues
exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel&s
motion to withdraw.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
