Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jack Burton Mgt. v. American Natl. Ins., 00-1199 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 00-1199 Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 22, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-1199 _ Jack Burton Management Co., a * Missouri Corporation, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * American National Insurance Co., * [UNPUBLISHED] a Texas corporation, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: November 16, 2000 Filed: November 22, 2000 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jack Burton Management Co. (JBM) leased property for 99 years a
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1199 ___________ Jack Burton Management Co., a * Missouri Corporation, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * American National Insurance Co., * [UNPUBLISHED] a Texas corporation, * * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: November 16, 2000 Filed: November 22, 2000 ___________ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and BYE, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Jack Burton Management Co. (JBM) leased property for 99 years and subleased it to Gilroy, Sims & Associates. American National Insurance Co. acquired the leasehold interest through foreclosure and eventually stopped paying rent. Alleging breach of the sublease, JBM brought this diversity action seeking damages from American National. Applying Missouri law, the district court granted partial summary judgment to JBM on the liability issue, concluding American National stood in the same position as an assignee of the sublease and thus was liable to JBM under privity of estate. After a bench trial on damages, the district court awarded JBM $104,221.60 for past due rents and $410,972.36 for the present value of the lost future rent and tax payments due through the rest of the sublease term. On appeal, American National attacks the district court's conclusions that American National assumed the sublease's obligations absent privity of contract, and that American National had privity of estate after American National surrendered the property. American National also argues that in deciding the amount of damages, the district court should not have used the federal postjudgment interest rate as the discount rate. Having carefully reviewed the parties' briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we conclude the district court committed no error and affirm without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer