Filed: Jan. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-1736 _ Diana Danhauer, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * v. * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the District JK Tooling and Machine, Inc., * of Nebraska * Defendant -Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: December 14, 2000 Filed: January 23, 2001 _ Before McMILLIAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. JK Tooling, Inc., appeals from the judgment in favor of Diana Danhauer on her Title VI
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-1736 _ Diana Danhauer, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * v. * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the District JK Tooling and Machine, Inc., * of Nebraska * Defendant -Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: December 14, 2000 Filed: January 23, 2001 _ Before McMILLIAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. JK Tooling, Inc., appeals from the judgment in favor of Diana Danhauer on her Title VII..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1736 ___________ Diana Danhauer, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * v. * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the District JK Tooling and Machine, Inc., * of Nebraska * Defendant -Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] ___________ Submitted: December 14, 2000 Filed: January 23, 2001 ___________ Before McMILLIAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge. ___________ PER CURIAM. JK Tooling, Inc., appeals from the judgment in favor of Diana Danhauer on her Title VII claim and supplemental state law discrimination claim alleging insufficient evidence and error in denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law. 1 The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. After a careful examination of the record and with due deference given in favor of the verdict, this Court finds there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The district court, therefore, properly denied JK Tooling’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. Under Eighth Circuit Rule 47B, no further commentary is warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
