Filed: Feb. 27, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2292 _ John E. Ampleman; Noel F. * Ampleman, * * Appellants, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Janet Schweiss, individually and in * District Court for the Eastern her official capacity as a caseworker * District of Missouri. for the Missouri Division of Family * Services; George Ann Cooper, * individually and in her official * [UNPUBLISHED] capacity as a caseworker for the * Missouri Division of Family * Services; Missouri Di
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2292 _ John E. Ampleman; Noel F. * Ampleman, * * Appellants, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Janet Schweiss, individually and in * District Court for the Eastern her official capacity as a caseworker * District of Missouri. for the Missouri Division of Family * Services; George Ann Cooper, * individually and in her official * [UNPUBLISHED] capacity as a caseworker for the * Missouri Division of Family * Services; Missouri Div..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-2292
___________
John E. Ampleman; Noel F. *
Ampleman, *
*
Appellants, *
*
v. *
* Appeal from the United States
Janet Schweiss, individually and in * District Court for the Eastern
her official capacity as a caseworker * District of Missouri.
for the Missouri Division of Family *
Services; George Ann Cooper, *
individually and in her official * [UNPUBLISHED]
capacity as a caseworker for the *
Missouri Division of Family *
Services; Missouri Division of *
Family Services, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 21, 2001
Filed: February 27, 2001
___________
Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
John and Noel Ampleman appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in their action alleging due process violations, abuse of process, and
malicious prosecution. After de novo review, see Schuver v. MidAm. Energy Co.,
154
F.3d 795, 799 (8th Cir. 1998), we agree with the district court, for the reasons
explained in its order, that the Amplemans’ action was time-barred.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
2