Filed: Apr. 27, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-3256 _ Carl E. Brant, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., dba Armour * Swift Eckrich Consumer Products * [UNPUBLISHED] Company, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 20, 2001 Filed: April 27, 2001 _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Carl E. Brant appeals the district court's dismissal of Bran
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-3256 _ Carl E. Brant, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., dba Armour * Swift Eckrich Consumer Products * [UNPUBLISHED] Company, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 20, 2001 Filed: April 27, 2001 _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Carl E. Brant appeals the district court's dismissal of Brant..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-3256
___________
Carl E. Brant, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Northern
* District of Iowa.
Swift-Eckrich, Inc., dba Armour *
Swift Eckrich Consumer Products * [UNPUBLISHED]
Company, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 20, 2001
Filed: April 27, 2001
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Carl E. Brant appeals the district court's dismissal of Brant's disability-
discrimination suit against his former employer. We have reviewed the record and
agree Brant did not meet the statutory prerequisites for filing his lawsuit. See 42
U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1) (charge of discrimination must be filed with Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days of unlawful employment practice);
Boersig v. Union Elec. Co.,
219 F.3d 816, 821 (8th Cir. 2000) (reasonable-
accommodation claim was barred because plaintiff filed EEOC charge after time
prescribed by § 2000e-5(e)), cert. denied,
121 S. Ct. 857 (2001). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-