Filed: May 21, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-3482 _ Robert J. Norbeck, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Basin Electric Power Cooperative, * District of North Dakota. * [Unpublished] Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 16, 2001 Filed: May 21, 2001 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Basin Electric Power Cooperative (Basin) appeals from the district court’s order and judgment entered following our r
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-3482 _ Robert J. Norbeck, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Basin Electric Power Cooperative, * District of North Dakota. * [Unpublished] Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 16, 2001 Filed: May 21, 2001 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Basin Electric Power Cooperative (Basin) appeals from the district court’s order and judgment entered following our re..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-3482
___________
Robert J. Norbeck, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Basin Electric Power Cooperative, * District of North Dakota.
* [Unpublished]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: May 16, 2001
Filed: May 21, 2001
___________
Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Basin Electric Power Cooperative (Basin) appeals from the district court’s order
and judgment entered following our remand in this retaliatory discharge case. See
Norbeck v. Basin Elec. Power Coop.,
215 F.3d 848 (8th Cir. 2000). Basin argues that
the district court erred in entering judgment in favor of both plaintiff Robert J. Norbeck
and Basin when this court in its mandate instructed the district court to enter judgment
in favor of Basin. We agree with Basin that the district court’s judgment on remand is
inconsistent with the law which exonerates an employer who succeeds--as did Basin--
on a dual-motive defense, and that the judgment also is inconsistent with our mandate.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to modify the judgment
to read as follows:
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered nunc pro
tunc to April 6, 1999, document no. 60. That judgment is against Plaintiff
Robert J. Norbeck and in favor of Defendant Basin Electric Power
Cooperative. Parties to bear their own trial costs. Defendant to have its
appellate costs in the amount of $779.30.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-