United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                     ___________

                                     No. 00-2231
                                     ___________

United States of America,                 *
                                          *
             Appellee,                    *
                                          *
      v.                                  * Appeal from the United States
                                          * District Court for the
Teresa Campos-Tellez,                     * District of Minnesota.
                                          *
             Appellant.                   *      [UNPUBLISHED]
                                     ___________

                            Submitted: May 15, 2001
                                Filed: May 18, 2001
                                    ___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
                          ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Teresa Campos-Tellez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute
methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and the district court1 sentenced her
to 87 months of imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, she argues
that the court clearly erred in granting her a 2-level minor-participant reduction rather
than a 4-level minimal-participant reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2.




      1
      The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
       We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in denying Campos-Tellez
a minimal-participant reduction. See United States v. Ortiz, 

, 422 (8th
Cir. 2001) (standard of review; district court did not clearly err in denying either minor-
or minimal-participant reduction upon finding that defendant drove car used for
transporting drugs and seemed quite aware of what was happening during drug sale).
The unobjected-to facts in the presentence report adequately support the court’s finding
that she was not a minimal participant, see United States v. Belitz, 

, 818
(8th Cir. 1998), and Campos-Tellez did not meet her burden to prove entitlement to the
greater reduction, see United States v. Correa, 

, 416 (8th Cir. 1999).

      Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

      A true copy.

             Attest:

                     CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                            -2-