Filed: Jun. 05, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2723WM _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the Western District * of Missouri. * Daniel J. Whitt, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 24, 2001 Filed: June 5, 2001 _ Before LOKEN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. After a hearing, the District Court1 found that Daniel J. Whitt had violated the conditions of his supervised re
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2723WM _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the Western District * of Missouri. * Daniel J. Whitt, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 24, 2001 Filed: June 5, 2001 _ Before LOKEN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. After a hearing, the District Court1 found that Daniel J. Whitt had violated the conditions of his supervised rel..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 00-2723WM
_____________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * On Appeal from the United
* States District Court
v. * for the Western District
* of Missouri.
*
Daniel J. Whitt, * [Not To Be Published]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: May 24, 2001
Filed: June 5, 2001
___________
Before LOKEN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
After a hearing, the District Court1 found that Daniel J. Whitt had violated the
conditions of his supervised release, revoked it, and sentenced him to six months
imprisonment and one year supervised release. Whitt appeals.
We have reviewed the district court record and appellant's brief. Finding no
error, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. When the District Court imposed
1
The Hon. Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
Western District of Missouri.
sentence on revocation of supervised release, the punishment selected was less than the
statutory maximum, less than the three years of supervised release originally received
by the defendant, and at the lower range of the term suggested by the Guidelines,
U.S.S.G. ยง 7B1.4(a). Violations that Whitt admitted (testing positive for marijuana),
standing alone, were sufficient to support the Court's action.
Affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-