Filed: Aug. 08, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-4039 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * of Missouri. * Lester McGrone, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: August 6, 2001 Filed: August 8, 2001 _ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lester McGrone appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of McGrone's car. Specifically, McGr
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-4039 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * of Missouri. * Lester McGrone, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: August 6, 2001 Filed: August 8, 2001 _ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lester McGrone appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of McGrone's car. Specifically, McGro..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-4039
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
v. * of Missouri.
*
Lester McGrone, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: August 6, 2001
Filed: August 8, 2001
___________
Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Lester McGrone appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress
evidence seized during a search of McGrone's car. Specifically, McGrone argues the
court committed clear error when it credited a police officer's testimony that he arrested
McGrone for driving without a license before the search of his car. Having reviewed
the record, we reject McGrone's argument. See United States v. Jones, No. 99-3027,
2001 WL 673578, *2 (8th Cir. June 18, 2001) (district court's credibility determinations
are "well-nigh unreviewable"); United States v. Snook,
88 F.3d 605, 607 (8th Cir.
1996) (standard of review). In our view, the district court properly denied McGrone's
suppression motion because the car was searched incidental to McGrone's arrest. See
New York v. Belton,
453 U.S. 454, 460 (1981); United States v. Dawdy,
46 F.3d
1427, 1430 (8th Cir. 1995); United States v. Riedesel,
987 F.2d 1383, 1389 (8th Cir.
1993). We thus affirm the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-