Filed: Aug. 01, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-3830 _ Harry James Sutton, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. U.S. Probation Office; Timothy M. * Scharr, U.S. Probation Officer; * [UNPUBLISHED] Kathleen M. Hawk, Director of Bureau, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: July 26, 2001 Filed: August 1, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Harry James Sutton appeals the district court’s
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-3830 _ Harry James Sutton, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. U.S. Probation Office; Timothy M. * Scharr, U.S. Probation Officer; * [UNPUBLISHED] Kathleen M. Hawk, Director of Bureau, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: July 26, 2001 Filed: August 1, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Harry James Sutton appeals the district court’s1..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-3830
___________
Harry James Sutton, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
U.S. Probation Office; Timothy M. *
Scharr, U.S. Probation Officer; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Kathleen M. Hawk, Director of Bureau, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 26, 2001
Filed: August 1, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Harry James Sutton appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
dismissal of his action under the Privacy Act, in which he alleged that his presentence
report contained “inaccurate” information. This appeal is frivolous, and therefore we
dismiss it. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
1
The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge
for the Eastern District of Missouri.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-