Filed: Sep. 17, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-1717 _ Ronald Miller, Jr.; * Ronald Miller, Jr., on behalf of * minor child Megan K. Miller, * * Appeal from the United States Appellants, * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Marcia Yung, formerly known * as Marcia Miller, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 7, 2001 Filed: September 17, 2001 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ronald M
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-1717 _ Ronald Miller, Jr.; * Ronald Miller, Jr., on behalf of * minor child Megan K. Miller, * * Appeal from the United States Appellants, * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Marcia Yung, formerly known * as Marcia Miller, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 7, 2001 Filed: September 17, 2001 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ronald Mi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1717
___________
Ronald Miller, Jr.; *
Ronald Miller, Jr., on behalf of *
minor child Megan K. Miller, *
* Appeal from the United States
Appellants, * District Court for the Southern
* District of Iowa.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Marcia Yung, formerly known *
as Marcia Miller, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: September 7, 2001
Filed: September 17, 2001
___________
Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Miller, Jr., on behalf of himself and his minor child, Megan, appeals from
the district court’s1 dismissal without prejudice of his lawsuit. Having carefully
reviewed the record and appellants’ brief, we agree with the district court that it lacked
1
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
subject matter jurisdiction over Miller’s claims concerning child visitation. See
Thompson v. Thompson,
484 U.S. 174, 187 (1988); Kahn v. Kahn,
21 F.3d 859, 861
(8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-