Filed: Nov. 15, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-2215 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Robert E. Downs, * Eastern District of Missouri. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: November 7, 2001 Filed: November 15, 2001 _ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Robert E. Downs pleaded guilty to making a false statement when purchasing a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), and b
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-2215 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Robert E. Downs, * Eastern District of Missouri. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: November 7, 2001 Filed: November 15, 2001 _ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Robert E. Downs pleaded guilty to making a false statement when purchasing a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), and be..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-2215
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Robert E. Downs, * Eastern District of Missouri.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: November 7, 2001
Filed: November 15, 2001
___________
Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Robert E. Downs pleaded guilty to making a false statement when purchasing
a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), and being a felon in possession of a
firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court1 sentenced him to
33 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. Downs argues on appeal,
renewing the objection he presented below, that the court erroneously set his base
offense level by characterizing as a crime of violence his prior Missouri conviction
for statutory rape.
1
The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
We reject this argument as foreclosed by United States v. Bauer,
990 F.2d 373,
374-75 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), and United States v. Rodriguez,
979 F.2d 138,
140-41 (8th Cir. 1992).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-