Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alla S. Bogdan v. John D. Ashcroft, 00-3695 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 00-3695 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 19, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-3695 _ Alla S. Bogdan, Yevgeniya Bogdan, * Roman V. Bogdan, * * Petitioners, * Petition for Review from a * Decision of the Board of v. * Immigration Appeals. * John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General * [UNPUBLISHED] of the United States; Immigration * and Naturalization Service, * * Respondents. * _ Submitted: October 17, 2001 Filed: December 19, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, AND HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Petitione
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-3695 ___________ Alla S. Bogdan, Yevgeniya Bogdan, * Roman V. Bogdan, * * Petitioners, * Petition for Review from a * Decision of the Board of v. * Immigration Appeals. * John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General * [UNPUBLISHED] of the United States; Immigration * and Naturalization Service, * * Respondents. * ___________ Submitted: October 17, 2001 Filed: December 19, 2001 ___________ Before BOWMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, AND HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Petitioners, natives and citizens of Ukraine, seek reversal of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board). An Immigration Judge (IJ) found petitioners removable for remaining in the United States longer than permitted and denied the requested relief of asylum and withholding of removal; the Board dismissed their appeal. This petition for review followed. Having carefully considered the briefs and record, we affirm the denial of petitioners' claims. The IJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence, and the Board's dismissal of petitioners' appeal therefore must be sustained. Alla Bogdan also asserts a claim for relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture. Because this claim does not appear to have been raised in the administrative proceedings, and was not considered by either the IJ or the Board, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider it. Affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer