Filed: Jun. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-1166EM _ Charles Pointer, * * Appellant, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the Eastern District * of Missouri. * St. Louis County Special * [Not To Be Published] School District, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 17, 2002 Filed: June 27, 2002 _ Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Pointer brought this action for race discrimination under Title
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-1166EM _ Charles Pointer, * * Appellant, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the Eastern District * of Missouri. * St. Louis County Special * [Not To Be Published] School District, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 17, 2002 Filed: June 27, 2002 _ Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Pointer brought this action for race discrimination under Title V..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 02-1166EM
_____________
Charles Pointer, *
*
Appellant, * On Appeal from the United
* States District Court
v. * for the Eastern District
* of Missouri.
*
St. Louis County Special * [Not To Be Published]
School District, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: June 17, 2002
Filed: June 27, 2002
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Pointer brought this action for race discrimination under Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. He alleged that he was
terminated from his position as a substitute teacher on account of his race. The
defendant, the Special School District of St. Louis County, moved for summary
judgment. The District Court granted this motion.1 The Court determined that Mr.
Pointer failed to establish a prima facie case of race discrimination. The Court stated
further that even if Mr. Pointer had presented sufficient evidence to support a prima
facie case of racial discrimination, he had failed to create a genuine issue of material
fact with regard to pretext under the burden-shifting framework set forth in
McDonnell Douglas v. Green,
411 U.S. 792 (1973). Because the District Court
provided a thorough analysis of the claim alleged and the facts presented, an extended
discussion is not necessary. We agree and affirm the District Court’s decision. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1
The Hon. E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-