Filed: Aug. 15, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-3509 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District Kit A. King, * of Nebraska. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: July 25, 2002 Filed: August 15, 2002 _ Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kit A. King appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Mr. King argues, as he did below, that th
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-3509 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District Kit A. King, * of Nebraska. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: July 25, 2002 Filed: August 15, 2002 _ Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kit A. King appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Mr. King argues, as he did below, that the..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-3509
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the District
Kit A. King, * of Nebraska.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: July 25, 2002
Filed: August 15, 2002
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit
Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Kit A. King appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to suppress
evidence. Mr. King argues, as he did below, that there was no probable cause to stop
the car in which he was a passenger. After carefully reviewing the record and the
parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude, for the reasons explained by the district
1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Kathleen A. Jaudzemis, United States Magistrate Judge for the District Nebraska.
court, that the officer in question had probable cause under the totality of the
circumstances to believe that the driver of the car had committed a traffic violation.
See United States v. Snook,
88 F.3d 605, 607 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-