Filed: Nov. 05, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-2460 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of South Dakota. Alan Ray Rick, also known as David * Allen Feakes, also known as George * [UNPUBLISHED] Braun, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: October 31, 2002 Filed: November 5, 2002 _ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. After Alan Ray Rick admitted to violating his supervised release,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-2460 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of South Dakota. Alan Ray Rick, also known as David * Allen Feakes, also known as George * [UNPUBLISHED] Braun, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: October 31, 2002 Filed: November 5, 2002 _ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. After Alan Ray Rick admitted to violating his supervised release, t..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-2460
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the District
* of South Dakota.
Alan Ray Rick, also known as David *
Allen Feakes, also known as George * [UNPUBLISHED]
Braun, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: October 31, 2002
Filed: November 5, 2002
___________
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
After Alan Ray Rick admitted to violating his supervised release, the district
court revoked supervised release, sentenced Rick to twelve months imprisonment and
forty-six months supervised release, and added an additional supervised release
condition. Judgment was entered on May 17, 2002, and on May 31, Rick filed a
notice of appeal designating this judgment. On appeal, Rick challenges only the
district court's imposition of the additional condition of supervised release.
Rick's May 31 notice of appeal was filed more than ten days, but fewer than
forty days, after the May 17 entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), 26(a);
United States v. Austin,
217 F.3d 595, 597 (8th Cir. 2000) (timely notice of appeal
is mandatory and jurisdictional, and issue is raised sua sponte even if parties concede
jurisdiction). We therefore remand to the district court for a finding on whether the
notice of appeal should be deemed timely based on excusable neglect or good cause.
See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4).
Accordingly, we remand to the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-