Filed: Dec. 06, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-2497 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Miguel Angel Miranda-Martinez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 3, 2002 Filed: December 6, 2002 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. A one-count indictment charged Miguel Angel Miranda-Martinez with being found in the United States without permiss
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-2497 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Miguel Angel Miranda-Martinez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 3, 2002 Filed: December 6, 2002 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. A one-count indictment charged Miguel Angel Miranda-Martinez with being found in the United States without permissi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-2497
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Miguel Angel Miranda-Martinez, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: December 3, 2002
Filed: December 6, 2002
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
A one-count indictment charged Miguel Angel Miranda-Martinez with being
found in the United States without permission, following his conviction for
aggravated felonies and his later deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(a) and
(b)(2). Miranda-Martinez pleaded guilty, and the district court* sentenced him to 46
months imprisonment and three years supervised release.
*
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas.
On appeal, Miranda-Martinez's counsel filed a brief and moved to withdraw
under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Upon careful review of the record,
including Miranda-Martinez's postsentencing letter to the district court, we conclude
there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988).
Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-