Filed: Aug. 26, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3501 _ Imogene L. Covin, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. OK Foods, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 7, 2003 Filed: August 26, 2003 _ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Imogene L. Covin appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of judgment following a bench trial in her Title VII action, in which she allege
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3501 _ Imogene L. Covin, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. OK Foods, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 7, 2003 Filed: August 26, 2003 _ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Imogene L. Covin appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of judgment following a bench trial in her Title VII action, in which she alleged..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3501
___________
Imogene L. Covin, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Arkansas.
OK Foods, Inc., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 7, 2003
Filed: August 26, 2003
___________
Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Imogene L. Covin appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of judgment
following a bench trial in her Title VII action, in which she alleged that her former
employer, OK Foods, Inc., discriminated against her on the basis of her race (African-
American) and sex, and that she was subjected to a hostile work environment.
Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we
1
The Honorable Beverly R. Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tadlock v. Powell,
291 F.3d
541, 546 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review in appeal from bench trial).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-