Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Odis Jackson v. RRRB, 03-1367 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 03-1367 Visitors: 55
Filed: Sep. 29, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1367 _ Odis Jackson, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the * Railroad Retirement Board. Railroad Retirement Board, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Respondent. * _ Submitted: September 3, 2003 Filed: September 29, 2003 _ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Odis Jackson petitions for review of the Railroad Retirement Board’s (Board’s) final decision denying his application for an annuity increase.
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 03-1367
                                    ___________

Odis Jackson,                            *
                                         *
             Petitioner,                 *
                                         * Petition for Review of
      v.                                 * an Order of the
                                         * Railroad Retirement Board.
Railroad Retirement Board,               *
                                         *    [UNPUBLISHED]
             Respondent.                 *
                                    ___________

                           Submitted: September 3, 2003
                               Filed: September 29, 2003
                                    ___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Odis Jackson petitions for review of the Railroad Retirement Board’s (Board’s)
final decision denying his application for an annuity increase. Having carefully
reviewed the record, see Worms v. Railroad Retirement Bd., 
255 F.3d 502
, 505 (8th
Cir. 2001) (standard of review), we affirm. Jackson has identified no legal authority--
and we have found none--to support his position that he is entitled to an annuity
increase based on his minor grandson retroactive to February 1993. Accordingly, we
affirm the decision of the Board. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer