Filed: Sep. 26, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1699 _ Carol Vanerka Stephens, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Estate of Raymond Clifford Ulmer, * deceased, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 5, 2003 Filed: September 26, 2003 _ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Carol Stephens appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her civil action against the Estate of Raymond C
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1699 _ Carol Vanerka Stephens, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Estate of Raymond Clifford Ulmer, * deceased, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 5, 2003 Filed: September 26, 2003 _ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Carol Stephens appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her civil action against the Estate of Raymond Cl..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1699
___________
Carol Vanerka Stephens, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Estate of Raymond Clifford Ulmer, *
deceased, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: September 5, 2003
Filed: September 26, 2003
___________
Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Carol Stephens appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her civil action against
the Estate of Raymond Clifford Ulmer. After de novo review, see Charchenko v. City
of Stillwater,
47 F.3d 981, 982-83 (8th Cir. 1995), we conclude that the district court
properly dismissed Stephens’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We
1
The Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the
District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
decline to address the issues Stephens raises for the first time on appeal. See
Alexander v. Pathfinder, Inc.,
189 F.3d 735, 742 (8th Cir. 1999).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-