Filed: Sep. 16, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1696 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] David D. Aguirre, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: September 11, 2003 Filed: September 16, 2003 _ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this direct appeal following his conditional guilty plea to a drug charge, David Aguirre challenges the district court’s
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1696 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] David D. Aguirre, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: September 11, 2003 Filed: September 16, 2003 _ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this direct appeal following his conditional guilty plea to a drug charge, David Aguirre challenges the district court’s1..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1696
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
* Western District of Arkansas.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
David D. Aguirre, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 11, 2003
Filed: September 16, 2003
___________
Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this direct appeal following his conditional guilty plea to a drug charge,
David Aguirre challenges the district court’s1 denial of his motion to suppress
evidence. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on
appeal, we conclude that denial of the motion to suppress was proper for the reasons
1
The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
explained by the district court. See United States v. Morgan,
270 F.3d 625, 630 (8th
Cir. 2001) (standard of review), cert. denied,
537 U.S. 849 (2002). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-