Filed: Jan. 06, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-2041 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Shelby Lamont Baccus, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 30, 2003 Filed: January 6, 2004 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Shelby Baccus appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed following revocation of his supervised relea
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-2041 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Shelby Lamont Baccus, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 30, 2003 Filed: January 6, 2004 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Shelby Baccus appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed following revocation of his supervised releas..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-2041
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Shelby Lamont Baccus, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: December 30, 2003
Filed: January 6, 2004
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Shelby Baccus appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed following
revocation of his supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, we
conclude that Baccus’s revocation sentence does not exceed the maximum prison
term authorized by statute, is within the range recommended by the Sentencing
1
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Guidelines policy statements, and does not reflect an abuse of discretion. See United
States v. Grimes,
54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review).
The judgment is affirmed. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-