Filed: Feb. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-2556 _ Gerry C. DuBose, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Gerald Ladwig, individually and as an * agent of Minnesota State Patrol; * [UNPUBLISHED] Cardinal Towing, individually and as a * business associate of Minnesota State * Patrol; Minnesota State Patrol, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 6, 2004 Filed: February 17, 2004 _ Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-2556 _ Gerry C. DuBose, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Gerald Ladwig, individually and as an * agent of Minnesota State Patrol; * [UNPUBLISHED] Cardinal Towing, individually and as a * business associate of Minnesota State * Patrol; Minnesota State Patrol, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 6, 2004 Filed: February 17, 2004 _ Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON,..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-2556
___________
Gerry C. DuBose, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Gerald Ladwig, individually and as an *
agent of Minnesota State Patrol; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Cardinal Towing, individually and as a *
business associate of Minnesota State *
Patrol; Minnesota State Patrol, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 6, 2004
Filed: February 17, 2004
___________
Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gerry C. DuBose appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment and the court’s subsequent refusal to reconsider its decision. Upon de novo
1
The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable
Susan Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
review, see Dennen v. City of Duluth,
350 F.3d 786, 790 (8th Cir. 2003), we find
DuBose’s arguments lack merit, and we conclude the district court properly granted
summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We also conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reconsider the grant of summary
judgment. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-