Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Christopher Giles, 03-2668 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 03-2668 Visitors: 46
Filed: Apr. 08, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-2668 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Christopher Paul Giles, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: April 1, 2004 Filed: April 8, 2004 _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Christopher Paul Giles pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine mix
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 03-2668
                                   ___________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
            Appellee,                   * Appeal from the United States
                                        * District Court for the District
      v.                                * of Minnesota.
                                        *
Christopher Paul Giles,                 *      [UNPUBLISHED]
                                        *
            Appellant.                  *
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: April 1, 2004

                                 Filed: April 8, 2004
                                  ___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                         ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Christopher Paul Giles pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute
more than 500 grams of methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). The district court* sentenced Giles to 121 months
imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Giles contends the
government acted in bad faith when it refused to file a motion for a substantial-
assistance departure.

      *
      The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
      After careful review, we reject Giles's argument. The plea agreement contained
no provisions for a substantial-assistance departure, see United States v. Barresse,
115 F.3d 610
, 612 (8th Cir. 1997), and Giles did not establish the government’s
decision was unconstitutionally motivated or irrational, see Wade v. United States,
504 U.S. 181
, 185-86 (1992). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court.
                       ______________________________




                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer