Filed: Apr. 06, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3028 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Michael Hubbard, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: March 5, 2004 Filed: April 6, 2004 _ Before BYE, MCMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Hubbard appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. After carefully reviewing the reco
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3028 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Michael Hubbard, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: March 5, 2004 Filed: April 6, 2004 _ Before BYE, MCMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Hubbard appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. After carefully reviewing the recor..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-3028
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Northern District of Iowa.
Michael Hubbard, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: March 5, 2004
Filed: April 6, 2004
___________
Before BYE, MCMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Hubbard appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon
revoking his supervised release. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude
the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors, see 18 U.S.C.
§ 3583(e)(3) (2000) (referencing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors to consider in revoking
supervised release), and did not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence above the
suggested Guidelines range, see United States v. Shepard,
329 F.3d 619, 621 (8th Cir.
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
2003); United States v. Shaw,
180 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam).
Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-