Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Randall Jarvis, 03-3042 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 03-3042 Visitors: 37
Filed: May 27, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3042 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Randall Brian Jarvis, also known as * Christopher Michaelson, also known * [UNPUBLISHED] as Josiah Richards, also known as * Order of Jesus Christ's Disciples, also * known as Order of Christian * Disciples, also known as Church of * Jesus Christ Disciples, also known as * Christian Disciples In
More
                   United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                  ___________

                                  No. 03-3042
                                  ___________

United States of America,                *
                                         *
             Appellee,                   *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
       v.                                * District Court for the Western
                                         * District of Missouri.
Randall Brian Jarvis, also known as      *
Christopher Michaelson, also known       *       [UNPUBLISHED]
as Josiah Richards, also known as        *
Order of Jesus Christ's Disciples, also *
known as Order of Christian              *
Disciples, also known as Church of       *
Jesus Christ Disciples, also known as *
Christian Disciples International,       *
                                         *
             Appellant.                  *
                                    ___________

                             Submitted: May 21, 2004
                                Filed: May 27, 2004
                                 ___________

Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.
       Randall Brian Jarvis (Jarvis) appeals the district court’s1 order granting the
government a default judgment against him for a permanent injunction. We conclude
that the court did not abuse its discretion. See Forsythe v. Hales, 
255 F.3d 487
, 490
(8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review). Jarvis failed to respond to the complaint;
thereafter, in violation of court rules, he attempted to submit by facsimile his response
to the government’s motion for a default order, and then did not cure the problem by
submitting a proper filing after the court informed him that his facsimile would not
be accepted; and he did not respond to the court’s two show-cause orders. Jarvis’s
arguments on the merits are thus irrelevant. See Ackra Direct Mktg. Corp. v.
Fingerhut Corp., 
86 F.3d 852
, 857 (8th Cir. 1996); Brown v. Kenron Aluminum &
Glass Corp., 
477 F.2d 526
, 531 (8th Cir. 1973).

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
                                           -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer