Filed: Jun. 28, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3781 _ Wylla B. Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 14, 2004 Filed: June 28, 2004 (Corrected 11/29/04) _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Wylla B. Johnson appeals the district court's1 order af
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3781 _ Wylla B. Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 14, 2004 Filed: June 28, 2004 (Corrected 11/29/04) _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Wylla B. Johnson appeals the district court's1 order aff..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-3781
___________
Wylla B. Johnson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, *
Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 14, 2004
Filed: June 28, 2004 (Corrected 11/29/04)
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Wylla B. Johnson appeals the district court's1 order affirming an administrative
law judge's (ALJ) finding that she was not eligible for supplemental security income
under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Having reviewed the record, we conclude
that the ALJ's finding was supported by substantial evidence. This case presents no
1
The Honorable James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c).
novel issues to justify an extended discussion. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court's judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-