Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Neil Lewis v. Roberts Dairy Co., 03-3941 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 03-3941 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 26, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3941 _ Neil Lewis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Roberts Dairy Company, LLC, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 18, 2004 Filed: July 26, 2004 _ Before SMITH, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. After his termination from employment with the Roberts Dairy Company ("Roberts"), Neil Lewis brought a claim of age and disability discrimination
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3941 ___________ Neil Lewis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Roberts Dairy Company, LLC, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: June 18, 2004 Filed: July 26, 2004 ___________ Before SMITH, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. After his termination from employment with the Roberts Dairy Company ("Roberts"), Neil Lewis brought a claim of age and disability discrimination against his former employer. Lewis's discrimination claims were submitted to the district court1 on the record that existed after a jury trial in which the jury failed to reach a verdict on the merits of his case. The district court concluded that Lewis's termination was based on a legitimate business reason and entered judgment in favor of Roberts. 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. The district court also found that Lewis failed to establish that he was disabled and that Lewis's termination was not based on his age. Lewis claims that the district court's factual findings were clearly erroneous and urges this court to overturn the district court's dismissal of his discrimination claims. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no error in the trial court's disposition of this matter. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer