Filed: Nov. 23, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-1221 _ Titan Wheel Corp. of Iowa, * Walcott Iowa, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * United States Environmental * [UNPUBLISHED] Protection Agency, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 17, 2004 Filed: November 23, 2004 _ Before WOLLMAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Titan Wheel Corp. of Iowa appeals from the district court's* adverse grant of su
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-1221 _ Titan Wheel Corp. of Iowa, * Walcott Iowa, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * United States Environmental * [UNPUBLISHED] Protection Agency, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 17, 2004 Filed: November 23, 2004 _ Before WOLLMAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Titan Wheel Corp. of Iowa appeals from the district court's* adverse grant of sum..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-1221 ___________ Titan Wheel Corp. of Iowa, * Walcott Iowa, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * United States Environmental * [UNPUBLISHED] Protection Agency, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: November 17, 2004 Filed: November 23, 2004 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Titan Wheel Corp. of Iowa appeals from the district court's* adverse grant of summary judgment in its action challenging a United States Environmental Protection Agency penalty for violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs and having considered their arguments, we conclude the district court's decision is clearly correct, and the * The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. issues do not warrant a comprehensive opinion. Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
