Filed: Feb. 15, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2079 _ Billy Grisso, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the United States of America; Catherine * Eastern District of Missouri. D. Perry, Judge; Jo Anne B. Barnhart, * [UNPUBLISHED] Commissioner, Social Security * Administration, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 7, 2005 Filed: February 15, 2005 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Billy Grisso appeals the di
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2079 _ Billy Grisso, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the United States of America; Catherine * Eastern District of Missouri. D. Perry, Judge; Jo Anne B. Barnhart, * [UNPUBLISHED] Commissioner, Social Security * Administration, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 7, 2005 Filed: February 15, 2005 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Billy Grisso appeals the dis..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-2079 ___________ Billy Grisso, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the United States of America; Catherine * Eastern District of Missouri. D. Perry, Judge; Jo Anne B. Barnhart, * [UNPUBLISHED] Commissioner, Social Security * Administration, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: February 7, 2005 Filed: February 15, 2005 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Billy Grisso appeals the district court’s1 dismissal as moot of his petition for a writ of mandamus, and the district court’s2 preservice dismissal of the United States 1 The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 2 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. and Judge Perry. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court explained. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
