Filed: Mar. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2528 _ Candice M. Sina, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Minnesota. Mortgage Electronic Registration * Systems, Inc.; Wilford & Geske, P.A.; * [UNPUBLISHED] James A. Geske, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: March 17, 2005 Filed: March 23, 2005 _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Candice M. Sina appeals the district court’s* grant of summ
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2528 _ Candice M. Sina, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Minnesota. Mortgage Electronic Registration * Systems, Inc.; Wilford & Geske, P.A.; * [UNPUBLISHED] James A. Geske, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: March 17, 2005 Filed: March 23, 2005 _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Candice M. Sina appeals the district court’s* grant of summa..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-2528
___________
Candice M. Sina, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the District
* of Minnesota.
Mortgage Electronic Registration *
Systems, Inc.; Wilford & Geske, P.A.; * [UNPUBLISHED]
James A. Geske, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: March 17, 2005
Filed: March 23, 2005
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Candice M. Sina appeals the district court’s* grant of summary judgment in
Sina’s action brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692
et seq. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude summary judgment was
*
The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan
G. Lebedoff, Chief United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
properly entered for the reasons stated by the district court. Thus, we affirm without
further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-