Filed: May 26, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2639 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Anthony L. Clemmons, * Western District of Missouri. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: May 18, 2005 Filed: May 26, 2005 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Anthony Clemmons challenges the sentence imposed by the district court1 upon his guilty plea to a felon-in-possession charge. His
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-2639 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Anthony L. Clemmons, * Western District of Missouri. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: May 18, 2005 Filed: May 26, 2005 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Anthony Clemmons challenges the sentence imposed by the district court1 upon his guilty plea to a felon-in-possession charge. His c..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-2639
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Anthony L. Clemmons, * Western District of Missouri.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: May 18, 2005
Filed: May 26, 2005
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Clemmons challenges the sentence imposed by the district court1 upon
his guilty plea to a felon-in-possession charge. His counsel has filed a brief and
moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). For
reversal, counsel argues that Clemmons’s criminal history was improperly calculated,
because three of his prior sentences should have been considered related. However,
these sentences were separated by intervening arrests, and thus were properly deemed
to be unrelated for purposes of Clemmons’s criminal history score. See U.S.S.G.
1
The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
§ 4A1.2. Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,
488
U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and
we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-