Filed: Sep. 29, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2510 _ Dwight Charles Stowe, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 7, 2005 Filed: September 29, 2005 _ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dwight Charles Stowe appeals the district court’s* judgment denying Stowe's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion for relief based on the S
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2510 _ Dwight Charles Stowe, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 7, 2005 Filed: September 29, 2005 _ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dwight Charles Stowe appeals the district court’s* judgment denying Stowe's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion for relief based on the Su..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2510
___________
Dwight Charles Stowe, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Southern
v. * District of Iowa.
*
United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: September 7, 2005
Filed: September 29, 2005
___________
Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Dwight Charles Stowe appeals the district court’s* judgment denying Stowe's
28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion for relief based on the Supreme Court’s recent holding in
United States v. Booker,
125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The district court granted a
certificate of appealability on whether the rule announced in Booker applies
retroactively to cases on collateral review. Because it does not, see Never Misses A
Shot v. United States,
413 F.3d 781, 783-84 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam), we affirm
*
The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.
the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Counsel’s motion to
withdraw is granted, and Stowe’s pro se motion for new counsel is denied.
______________________________
-2-