Filed: Nov. 04, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2395 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Mariano Duran, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: October 25, 2005 Filed: November 4, 2005 _ Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mariano Duran appeals the district court’s1 judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, wherein Duran sought relief based on the
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2395 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Mariano Duran, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: October 25, 2005 Filed: November 4, 2005 _ Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mariano Duran appeals the district court’s1 judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, wherein Duran sought relief based on the ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2395
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
Mariano Duran, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: October 25, 2005
Filed: November 4, 2005
___________
Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Mariano Duran appeals the district court’s1 judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 motion, wherein Duran sought relief based on the Supreme Court’s holding
in Blakely v. Washington,
542 U.S. 296 (2004). The district court granted a
certificate of appealability on whether the rule announced in Blakely applies
retroactively to cases on collateral review, and the Supreme Court thereafter issued
its decision in United States v. Booker,
125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Because neither
1
The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.
decision applies retroactively to final convictions, see Never Misses A Shot v. United
States,
413 F.3d 781, 783-84 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam), we affirm the judgment of
the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and
Duran’s pro se motion for new counsel is denied.
______________________________
-2-