Filed: May 24, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2548 _ Allen Ray Bishop, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. OK Foods, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 19, 2006 Filed: May 24, 2006 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Allen Ray Bishop appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination suit against OK Foods, Inc., bro
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2548 _ Allen Ray Bishop, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. OK Foods, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 19, 2006 Filed: May 24, 2006 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Allen Ray Bishop appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination suit against OK Foods, Inc., brou..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2548
___________
Allen Ray Bishop, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Arkansas.
OK Foods, Inc., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 19, 2006
Filed: May 24, 2006
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Allen Ray Bishop appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination suit against OK Foods, Inc., brought
under Title VII. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Kincaid v. City of Omaha,
378 F.3d 799, 803-04 (8th Cir. 2004) (de novo standard of review), we conclude that,
as a matter of law, the conduct to which Bishop was subjected at the hands of his
1
The Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
coworkers was not sufficiently severe or pervasive to amount to a racially hostile work
environment. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-