Filed: May 05, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2372 _ Susan Carol Bishop, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Surety Company; Jennifer * Eastern District of Missouri. Clark Williams; George Meyers; Greg * Melton, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 2, 2006 Filed: May 5, 2006 _ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Susan Bishop (Bishop) appeals the district court’s1 Federal Rule of Civil Pro
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2372 _ Susan Carol Bishop, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Surety Company; Jennifer * Eastern District of Missouri. Clark Williams; George Meyers; Greg * Melton, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 2, 2006 Filed: May 5, 2006 _ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Susan Bishop (Bishop) appeals the district court’s1 Federal Rule of Civil Proc..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2372
___________
Susan Carol Bishop, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Western Surety Company; Jennifer * Eastern District of Missouri.
Clark Williams; George Meyers; Greg *
Melton, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 2, 2006
Filed: May 5, 2006
___________
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Susan Bishop (Bishop) appeals the district court’s1 Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of her civil complaint. Having conducted de novo
review of the dismissal, and having accepted the facts in the complaint as true and
construing them in Bishop’s favor, see Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch.
Dist.,
133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir. 1998), we find the district court’s analysis to be
1
The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
thorough and well-reasoned, and we reject Bishop’s arguments for reversal.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-