Filed: Jun. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-3399 _ Gas Aggregation Services, Inc., * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * v. * * Howard Avista Energy, LLC; Howard * Energy Marketing, Inc.; * * Defendants - Appellees, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District of Thomas A. Foster; * Minnesota. * Movant Below, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Howard Avista Energy, LLC; * * Third Party Plaintiff. * * _ * * Manjit Bajwa, * * Third Party Defendant. * _ Submitted: June 12, 2006 File
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-3399 _ Gas Aggregation Services, Inc., * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * v. * * Howard Avista Energy, LLC; Howard * Energy Marketing, Inc.; * * Defendants - Appellees, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District of Thomas A. Foster; * Minnesota. * Movant Below, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Howard Avista Energy, LLC; * * Third Party Plaintiff. * * _ * * Manjit Bajwa, * * Third Party Defendant. * _ Submitted: June 12, 2006 Filed..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-3399
___________
Gas Aggregation Services, Inc., *
*
Plaintiff - Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Howard Avista Energy, LLC; Howard *
Energy Marketing, Inc.; *
*
Defendants - Appellees, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the District of
Thomas A. Foster; * Minnesota.
*
Movant Below, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Howard Avista Energy, LLC; *
*
Third Party Plaintiff. *
*
_______________________ *
*
Manjit Bajwa, *
*
Third Party Defendant. *
___________
Submitted: June 12, 2006
Filed: June 21, 2006
___________
Before BYE, LAY, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gas Aggregation Services, Inc., appeals the district court's1 order granting
Howard Avista Energy, LLC, and Howard Energy Marketing, LLC's motion to alter
or amend the district court's earlier judgment awarding pre-judgment interest on an
award for loss of business damages. The district court has provided a comprehensive
and well-reasoned opinion addressing the issues raised by the parties, and we have
nothing to add to the analysis. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
court for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Davis S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
-2-