Filed: Jun. 19, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2633 _ George Spann, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Arkansas Department of Finance and * Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 14, 2006 Filed: June 19, 2006 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. George Spann appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII employment-discri
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2633 _ George Spann, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Arkansas Department of Finance and * Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 14, 2006 Filed: June 19, 2006 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. George Spann appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII employment-discrim..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2633
___________
George Spann, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Arkansas Department of Finance and *
Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: June 14, 2006
Filed: June 19, 2006
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
George Spann appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his Title VII employment-discrimination suit against his former employer, Arkansas
Department of Finance and Administration (AFDA). Having carefully reviewed the
record, see Kincaid v. City of Omaha,
378 F.3d 799, 803-04 (8th Cir. 2004) (de novo
standard of review), we agree with the district court that Spann failed to establish that
AFDA’s proffered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse actions taken
1
The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Arkansas.
against Spann--continued performance deficiencies--were pretextual. See Gilooly v.
Mo. Dep’t of Health & Senior Servs.,
421 F.3d 734, 739 (8th Cir. 2005) (burden-
shifting analysis). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-