Filed: Jun. 05, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-1811 _ Rose M. Reynolds, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 30, 2006 Filed: June 5, 2006 _ Before MURPHY, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Rose Reynolds appeals the district court’s order1 affirming the denial of her applications
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-1811 _ Rose M. Reynolds, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 30, 2006 Filed: June 5, 2006 _ Before MURPHY, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Rose Reynolds appeals the district court’s order1 affirming the denial of her applications f..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-1811
___________
Rose M. Reynolds, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, *
Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 30, 2006
Filed: June 5, 2006
___________
Before MURPHY, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Rose Reynolds appeals the district court’s order1 affirming the denial of her
applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. After
thoroughly reviewing the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude substantial
evidence supports the Administrative Law Judge’s findings as to Reynolds’s
credibility, residual functional capacity, past relevant work, and ability to perform
1
The Honorable John F. Forster, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
light work. See Draper v. Barnhart,
425 F.3d 1127, 1130 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-