United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 05-3101
                                   ___________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
            Appellee,                   *
                                        * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                * District Court for the
                                        * Northern District of Iowa.
Isaias Alvarenga Vasquez,               *
                                        * [UNPUBLISHED]
            Appellant.                  *
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: August 9, 2006
                                Filed: August 14, 2006
                                 ___________

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Isaias Alvarenga Vasquez pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United
States after having been deported following a conviction in Iowa for reckless use of
a firearm. Ruling that the Iowa conviction was an aggravated felony, the district
court1 sentenced Vasquez to 24 months in prison and 2 years of supervised release.
See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2).




      1
        The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
       On appeal, Vasquez’s counsel argues a prior sentence Vasquez received for a
marijuana-possession conviction should not have counted in the criminal history
calculation, because that offense conduct was related to the instant offense as both
offenses occurred at the same time and in the same place. We disagree. The offenses
were severable and distinct, and the only connection between the marijuana
possession and the illegal reentry was that the former led to his arrest for the latter.
See United States v. Troncoso, 

, 616-17 (1st Cir. 1994) (district court did
not err in counting prior drug-offense sentence in criminal history for illegal-reentry
conviction, because offenses were severable and distinct; only connection between
drug-sales conduct and immigration-offense conduct was that drug-sales conduct “set
in motion a chain of events” resulting in discovery of defendant’s illegal immigration
status).

      Counsel also argues, pursuant to Anders v. California, 

(1967), that
Vasquez’s prior conviction for reckless use of a firearm was not an aggravated felony,
and thus the court erred in imposing an 8-level enhancement under U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). Again, we disagree. The Iowa offense of reckless use of a firearm
is punishable by up to 2 years in prison, see Iowa Code §§ 724.30 (2003), 903.1
(2003), and the offense conduct creates a substantial risk of injury, see United States
v. Smith, 

, 722-23 (8th Cir. 2005). See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43), 18
U.S.C. § 16, U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, comment. (n.3) (defining aggravated felony).

      Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 

, 80 (1988), we
conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm.
                       ______________________________




                                          -2-