Filed: Sep. 05, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2896 _ Joe Aitro, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Henry S. Clapper; David Munton; * Western District of Missouri. George Nichols; City of Lockwood, * Missouri; Lockwood, MO Police * [UNPUBLISHED] Department; Ryan Robison; Ruth * Cottingham; Tamara Dewild; Lathrop * & Gage, L.C., * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 28, 2006 Filed: September 5, 2006 _ Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2896 _ Joe Aitro, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Henry S. Clapper; David Munton; * Western District of Missouri. George Nichols; City of Lockwood, * Missouri; Lockwood, MO Police * [UNPUBLISHED] Department; Ryan Robison; Ruth * Cottingham; Tamara Dewild; Lathrop * & Gage, L.C., * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 28, 2006 Filed: September 5, 2006 _ Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2896
___________
Joe Aitro, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Henry S. Clapper; David Munton; * Western District of Missouri.
George Nichols; City of Lockwood, *
Missouri; Lockwood, MO Police * [UNPUBLISHED]
Department; Ryan Robison; Ruth *
Cottingham; Tamara Dewild; Lathrop *
& Gage, L.C., *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: August 28, 2006
Filed: September 5, 2006
___________
Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Joe Aitro (Aitro) appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint
with prejudice. We dismiss the appeal with prejudice for failure to comply with the
rules of appellate procedure. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(a)(2), 28(a); 8th Cir. R. 28A(f);
1
The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
Faretta v. California,
422 U.S. 806, 834-35 n.46 (1975) (pro se litigants must comply
with relevant rules of procedure); Haugen v. Sutherlin,
804 F.2d 490, 491 (8th Cir.
1986) (where appellant violated Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Eighth
Circuit Rules pertaining to form for briefs and record, holding that any further filings
by appellant would result in sanctions and dismissing appeal as frivolous). Aitro’s
request for oral argument and his motion seeking remand to state court are denied.
______________________________
-2-