Filed: Oct. 11, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-4115 _ Jose Rafael Tineo, Suing as Jose Tineo, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Mayo * District of Minnesota. Hospital, Rochester, MN, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. * _ Submitted: October 5, 2006 Filed: October 11, 2006 _ Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Jose Tineo appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissa
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-4115 _ Jose Rafael Tineo, Suing as Jose Tineo, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Mayo * District of Minnesota. Hospital, Rochester, MN, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. * _ Submitted: October 5, 2006 Filed: October 11, 2006 _ Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Jose Tineo appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-4115
___________
Jose Rafael Tineo, Suing as Jose Tineo, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Federal Bureau of Prisons; Mayo * District of Minnesota.
Hospital, Rochester, MN, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: October 5, 2006
Filed: October 11, 2006
___________
Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Jose Tineo appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of
his complaint alleging medical malpractice and a violation of the Eighth Amendment.
Having conducted de novo review of the dismissal, we agree with the district court’s
decision to dismiss the case, and we reject Tineo’s arguments for reversal. See
1
Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
Cooper v. Schriro,
189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-