Filed: Jan. 29, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-4452 _ Gregory M. Crow; Brenda Crow; * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 26, 2007 Filed: January 29, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Gregory and Brenda Crow appeal the district court's1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their diversity action against Wal-
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-4452 _ Gregory M. Crow; Brenda Crow; * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 26, 2007 Filed: January 29, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Gregory and Brenda Crow appeal the district court's1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their diversity action against Wal-M..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-4452
___________
Gregory M. Crow; Brenda Crow; *
*
Appellants, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 26, 2007
Filed: January 29, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gregory and Brenda Crow appeal the district court's1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in their diversity action against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart). The
Crows sued Wal-Mart following an accident in which Gregory Crow drove a truck
into a “Pedestrian Crossing” sign in the Wal-Mart parking lot. The Crows alleged the
accident was the result of negligence and carelessness on the part of Wal-Mart.
1
The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
Upon our de novo review of the record, Engleson v. Little Falls Area Chamber
of Commerce,
362 F.3d 525, 528 (8th Cir. 2004), we find summary judgment was
proper for the reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-