Filed: Apr. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2041 _ In re: Rosemarie Ziemski, * * _ * * Rosemarie Ziemski, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel v. * for the Eighth Circuit. * Valerian Joseph Ziemski, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 8, 2007 Filed: April 6, 2007 _ Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Chapter 13 debtor Rosemarie Ziemski appeals from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2041 _ In re: Rosemarie Ziemski, * * _ * * Rosemarie Ziemski, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel v. * for the Eighth Circuit. * Valerian Joseph Ziemski, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 8, 2007 Filed: April 6, 2007 _ Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Chapter 13 debtor Rosemarie Ziemski appeals from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2041
___________
In re: Rosemarie Ziemski, *
*
_________________________ *
*
Rosemarie Ziemski, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
v. * for the Eighth Circuit.
*
Valerian Joseph Ziemski, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 8, 2007
Filed: April 6, 2007
___________
Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Chapter 13 debtor Rosemarie Ziemski appeals from the decision of the
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) reversing the bankruptcy court’s judgment holding
that her ex-husband, Valerian Ziemski, willfully violated the automatic stay of 11
U.S.C. § 362 by withholding military retirement benefits from Rosemarie’s
bankruptcy estate. Upon review of the bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear
error, and review of its legal conclusions de novo, see In re Vote,
276 F.3d 1024, 1026
(8th Cir. 2002), we agree with the BAP’s analysis and accordingly affirm the decision
of the BAP. Valerian Ziemski’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-